پژوهشنامه خراسان بزرگ

پژوهشنامه خراسان بزرگ

نقش محیطِ ساخته‌شده در ارتقاء روحیۀ تعاملی دانشجویان معماری در محیط‌های رسمی و غیررسمی در سه دانشگاه مشهد

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد معماری اسلامی، دانشگاه بین‌المللی امام رضا (ع)، مشهد، ایران
2 دانشیار، دانشکده هنر و معماری، دانشگاه علم و هنر، یزد، ایران
چکیده
هدف از پژوهش حاضر، بررسی نقش محیطِ ساخته‌شده در ارتقاء روحیۀ تعاملی (درسی، دوستانه، تفریحی، سیاسی- فرهنگی) دانشجویان معماری می‌باشد که در سه نمونۀ دانشگاه‌های فردوسی، بین‌المللی امام رضا (ع) و آزاد اسلامی مشهد، مورد مطالعه قرار گرفته است. با توجه به اینکه آموزش در رشتۀ معماری، هم نظری و هم عملی است، از این‌‌رو، نیاز به تعاملات اجتماعی، به‌طور ویژه احساس می‌شود. این تعاملات برای دانشجویان، لزوماً تنها در کلاس‌ها، آتلیه‌ها و فضاهای رسمی دانشکده امکان‌پذیر نیست، بلکه فضاهای جمعی و غیررسمی نیز دارای پتانسیل ویژه‌ای برای فعالیت‌های گروهی و انتقال تجارب با سایر دانشجویان معماری و شکل‌گیری روابط اجتماعی هستند. سؤال اصلی پژوهش مبنی بر آن است که: دانشجویان معماری، چه فضاهایی را برای تعامل ترجیح می‌دهند و مؤلفه‌های مورد‌نظر آن‌ها با توجه به نوع تعاملات چیست؟ در این راستا و با استفاده از روش توصیفی- تحلیلی، ابتدا از متون و مطالعات قبلی، چهارچوب نظری ارائه گشته؛ سپس نمونه‌های موردی با روش پیمایشی و استفاده از مشاهده و پرسشنامه و تحلیل‌های آماری، مورد مطالعه و ارزیابی قرار گرفته و میزان تأثیر هر عامل در ترجیح مکانی دانشجویان برای تعاملات (درسی، دوستانه، تفریحی، سیاسی- فرهنگی) تبیین گردیده است؛ در نهایت نیز داده‌ها با استفاده از نرم‌افزار SPSS و آزمون اندازه‌های مکرر و آزمون بونفرونی مورد تجزیه‌و‌تحلیل قرار گرفته‌اند. نتایج تحقیق بیانگر آن است که تعامل دوستانه و تفریحی دانشجویان معماری، در هر سه دانشگاه به‌طور معناداری بیشتر از تعاملات درسی و سیاسی- فرهنگی در انتخاب فضاها مؤثر بوده؛ از طرفی در دانشگاه آزاد، تسهیلات مناسب نشستن و در دانشگاه فردوسی و دانشگاه امام رضا (ع) نیز فعالیت‌های گروهی، مؤثرترین عوامل در انتخاب فضاها بوده‌اند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

The Effect of Built Environment on Architecture Students` Interactions in Formal and Informal Spaces of Three Mashhad Universities

نویسندگان English

AmirHosain Khalghani 1
Somayeh Omidvari 2
1 MSc Student of Architecture, Imam Reza University, Mashad, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Art and Architecture, Science and Arts University, Yazd, Iran.
چکیده English

The aim of this research is to examine the role of the built environment in enhancing the interactive spirit (educational, friendly, recreational, political-cultural) of architecture students across three universities: Ferdowsi University, Imam Reza International University, and Islamic Azad University in Mashhad. Given that education in architecture is both theoretical and practical, there is a particular need for social interactions. These interactions are not confined to classrooms, studios, and formal spaces; rather, collective and informal areas also hold significant potential for group activities, sharing experiences with fellow architecture students, and forming social relationships. The main research question is: What spaces do architecture students prefer for interaction, and what components do they consider important based on the type of interactions? A descriptive-analytical method was employed for this purpose. Initially, a theoretical framework was established based on previous literature. Subsequently, case studies were examined using surveys, observations, questionnaires, and statistical analyses to evaluate the impact of various factors on students' preferences for interaction spaces (educational, friendly, recreational, political-cultural). The data were analyzed using SPSS software through repeated measures and Bonferroni tests. The results indicate that friendly and recreational interactions among architecture students significantly influence space selection more than educational and political-cultural interactions across all three universities. Furthermore, at Islamic Azad University, suitable seating facilities emerged as the most influential factor in space selection, while group activities were identified as the most significant factors at Ferdowsi University and Imam Reza International University.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Social Interaction
Formal and Informal Spaces
Space Features
Built Environment Effects
Architecture Faculty
  • Adedayo, O. F., Oyetola, S. A., Anunobi, A. I. & Adebayo, O. A. (2017). Students’ Perception of Informal Interaction Spaces in Faculty Buildings of Federal University of Technology, Minna, Nigeria. Journal of Interior Designing and Regional Planning. 2(2), 1-16. https://spaj.ukm.my/jsb/index.php/jbp/article/view/299
  • Akbarzadeh, Z., Heidarnattaj, V., Ahmadi, F. & Baezzat, F. (2020). The Effect of layout on Educational Spaces Design to Improve academic and cognitive performance, Journal of Architectural Thought, 3(6), 96-109. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.30479/at.2020.11995.1367
  • Alitajer, S., & Zarei hajiabadi, F. (2016). The Effect of Built Environment on Students` Interactions in Informal Spaces of Architecture Schools, Two Case Studies in Iran, Journal of Fine Arts: Architecture & Urban Planning, 21(1), 79-90. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22059/jfaup.2016.59691
  • Asadi, R., & Sabouri, M. (2023) Citizens' Satisfaction Analysis of Urban Parks from the Perspective of Distributive Justice (case study: District 6 of Mashhad Municipality), Quarterly Bulletin of Greater Khorasan, 13(49), 87-105. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22034/jgk.2022.308614.0
  • Azemati, H., R., Sabahi, S., & Azemati, S. (2012). Environmental factors affecting student satisfaction of Learning Spaces, Quarterly of Naqshejahan, 2(1), 31-42. (In Persian with English abstract). http://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.23224991.1391.2.1.1.1
  • Azemati, S., Mozaffar, F., Hosseini S. B., & Saleh sedgh pour, B. (2017). University-Based Design Principles of Open spaces Creative Vitality and Social Interaction, Journal of Research in Educational Systems, 11(37), 179-201. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22034/jiera.2017.57771
  • Birjandineghad, M. & Abedmojiri, A., (2022). Principles of formal arrangement of the entrance to the house in the past architecture based on three theories of environmental psychology. (Case study: three traditional houses in the holy city of Mashhad), Quarterly Bulletin of Greater Khorasan, 13(48), 69-88. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22034/jgk.2022.308505.0
  • Charkhchian, M., & Daneshpour, S., A. (2010). The Study of Responsible Public Space Designing Components, Journal of Geography and Planning, 14(30), 53-85. (In Persian with English abstract). https://www.sid.ir/paper/203687/fa
  • Dadfar, P., Karimifard, L., & Dolatabadi, F. (2022). Spatial experience and sensory perception: rereading the space in architecture (Case study: Goharshad Mosque), Quarterly Bulletin of Greater Khorasan, 11(45), 17-30. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22034/jgk.2022.308547.0
  • Daneshgar moghaddam, G., Bahrainy S., H., & Einifar, A. (2011). An Investigation on sociability of the spaces based on perception of nature in the built environment, Journal of Fine Arts: Architecture & Urban Planning, 3(45), 25-36. (In Persian with English abstract). https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.22286020.1390.3.45.3.5
  • Eisenhauer, B. W., Krannich, R. S & Blahna, D. J. (2000). Attachments to special places on public lands: An analysis of activities, reason for attachments, and community connections, Society and Natural Resources, 13(5) 421– 441. https://doi.org/10.1080/089419200403848
  • Ellis, R. A., & Goodyear, P. (2016). Models of Learning Space: Integrating Research on Space, Place and Learning in Higher Education. Review of Education, 4(2), 149-191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3056
  • Eshaghi, A. and Khozaei, F. (2016). In the Eyes of the Beholder: Students’ Degree of Satisfaction with Traditional versus Suite Style Residence Halls. American Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture. 4(5). 159-164. DOI: 10.12691/ajcea-4-5-2
  • Fakourian, F., & Hamzenejad, M. (2018). Architecture School, A field of creativity development of the students, Quarterly Journal of Innovation and Creativity in Human Sciences, 8(2), 43-86. (In Persian with English abstract). https://sanad.iau.ir/Journal/ichs/Article/929370
  • Gebhardt, C. (2014). The Spaces Between the Rooms: A Post-Occupancy Evaluation of Informal Social Spaces in the HEDCO Education Building [BSC Thesis]. Clark Honors College of the University of Oregon, Eugene. https://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu/xmlui/handle/1794/18241
  • Ghalambor Dezfuly, M., & Naghizadeh, M. (2014). Urban Design the Context of Social Interaction Enhancement (Case Study: Street Between Neighborhoods), Hoviatshahr Journal, 8(17), 15-24. (In Persian with English abstract). https://ensani.ir/fa/article/488162/
  • Habibi, A. (2007). SPSS training, Parsmodir electronic publication. https://parsmodir.com/db/spss.php
  • Hornecker, E. (2005). Space and Place – setting the stage for social interaction. In Position paper presented at ECSCW05 workshop Setting for Collaboration: The Role of Place. https://www.academia.edu/1796978/Space_and_Place_setting_the_stage_for_social_interaction
  • Jafari, E., Gholamalizadeh, H., & Modiri, M. (2020). Identification of Factors Affecting Sociopetality in the Educational Environment of Architecture and Analyzing the Interaction between Them via F. MCDM (Fuzzy Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Approach), Journal of Iranian Architecture & Urbanism (JIAU), 10(2), 5-18. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.30475/isau.2020.103673
  • Kateb, M., Divandari, J. Danayini, A. (2017). The role of open space, nature and landscape in improving the educational quality of schools (functional analysis of the theory of reconstruction of mental focus in landscape architecture), Quarterly of Green Architecture, 2(5), 21-28. (In Persian). https://ensani.ir/fa/article/367661
  • Khozaei, F., Hassan, A.S., Al Kodmany, K. and Aarab, Y. (2014). Examination of student housing preferences, their similarities and differences. Facilities. 32(11/12). 709-722. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/F-08-2012-0061
  • Kokabi, A. (2007). Criteria for evaluating the Urban quality of life in City centers, hoviatshahr Journal, 1(1), 75-78. (In Persian with English abstract). https://sanad.iau.ir/Journal/hoviatshahr/Article/795480
  • Kopec, D. (2018). Environmental psychology for design in architectural spaces. (M. Kameli & S. B. Hosseini, Trans.). Parham Naqsh Publishing. (Original work published 2012)
  • Lang, J. (2019). Creating architectural theory: the role of the behavioral sciences in environmental design. (A. Einifar, Trans.). University of Tehran Press. 11th Edition. (Original work published 1987)
  • Maina, J. J. (2017). Informal space-use in formal learning environments: case study of architecture department at Ahmadu Bello University. 7th West Africa Built Environment Research (WABER) Conference, University of Ghana in Accra, 16-18 August 2017, 930-944. https://demo.icandoworld.com/waberconference/previous-conferences.php
  • Mansouri, T., & Jahanbakhsh, H. (2017). Factors affecting the measurement of promoting social interaction and socialization in the Urban Space (Case Study: Kermanshah Modares Street), Journal of Iranian Architecture and Urbanism, 7(1), 59-65. (In Persian with English abstract). https://www.doi.org/10.30475/isau.2017.62017
  • Moghanizadeh Tarshizi, M., Abdemojiri, A., & Madahi, S., M. (2021). Analyzing the Social Interactions in the Spatial Structure of Traditional Houses Case Study: Kashmar City, Quarterly Bulletin of Greater Khorasan, 11(40), 97-114. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22034/jgk.2020.137969
  • Mohammadi, M., &  AyatollahI, M., (2015). Effective Factors in Promoting Sociability of Cultural Buildings Case Study: Farshchian Cultural Academy in Isfahan, Journal of Architecture and Urban Planning, 8(15), 79-96. (In Persian with English abstract). https://www.doi.org/10.30480/aup.2015.12
  • Moos, R., Lee, E. (1979). Comparing residence hall and independent living settings. Research in Higher Education. 11( ). 207–221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00975125
  • Moosavi, S., M., & Akbarzadeh, Z. (2020). Determining the Physical Components of Effective Teamwork Enhancement in The Architectural Studio (Case Study: Architectural Classes of University of Mazandaran), Scientific Journal of Architectural Thought, 5(9), 250-262. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.30479/at.2020.12489.1421
  • Najib, NUM, Yusof, N. A., Sani, N. M. (2012). The Effects of Students’ Socio-Physical Backgrounds onto Satisfaction with Student Housing Facilities. Social and Behavioral Sciences Procedia. 62( ). 64-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.013
  • Namazian, A., & Qaroni, F. (2014). The missing link of environmental psychology in architectural education, Journal of Iranian Architecture & Urbanism (JIAU), 4(5), 121-131. (In Persian). https://www.doi.org/10.30475/isau.2014.61968
  • Norberg-Shulz, C. (2003). Architecture: meaning and place, (V. Norooz Brazjani, Trans.). jan-e-jahan Publisher, (Original work published 1998)
  • Owens, J. T. (2010). The Impact of University Housing Construction Type on Psychosocial Development of First-Year Students [PHD Thesis]. The Graduate School of Clemson University, Clemson.
  • Rahimi, S. (2015). Social Interaction in Student Residence Halls: An Architectural Perspective [MSC Thesis]. Pennsylvania State University, Centre County.
  • Rands, M., & Gansemer-Topf, A. (2017). The Room Itself is Active: How Classroom Design Impacts Student Engagement, Journal of Learning Spaces, 6(1). 26-33. https://libjournal.uncg.edu/jls/article/view/1286/1028
  • Zahraee, S., B., & Pazhouhanfar, M. (2016). Effect of visual quality of university campuses on social interaction of students (Case study: Gorgan), Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 21(1), 169-182. (In Persian). (DOI): 10.22034/jest.2018.13781
دوره 15، شماره 56
پاییز 1403
صفحه 95-118

  • تاریخ دریافت 12 تیر 1401
  • تاریخ بازنگری 17 مرداد 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش 05 مهر 1403